Karl Barth on Truth and the Gospel
"The Gospel is not a truth among other truths. Rather, it sets a question-mark against all truths."
(Epistle to the Romans, 35)
This sounds like something to ponder - it feels very profound. But first I need some help from the Barth scholars out there: What exactly is Barth's point here? What is he saying and what is he not saying?
(Epistle to the Romans, 35)
This sounds like something to ponder - it feels very profound. But first I need some help from the Barth scholars out there: What exactly is Barth's point here? What is he saying and what is he not saying?
Comments
Any internalising of the Gospel on our part, any reshaping of our understanding into Gospel-shaped patterns, always remains a secondary reflection of the Gospel, and itself needs to be called into question again and again. To put it in a more jargony way, the Gospel never becomes our possession: it never becomes a fact about us, it always remains something that happens to us at God's hand. Our faith is not, as it were, a mirror of the Gospel (so that you could look at our faith and what you saw there would show you the Gospel): it's something more like an attentive readiness to be questioned by the Gospel.
this is both elequently put and very helpful. Thanks so much!
Robin